NZDF

Output Expense 2

Naval Combat Forces

Description

Provision of the capabilities of the frigates, HMNZ Ships Te Kaha and Te Mana, prepared to conduct maritime operations and to contribute support services to the community, in accordance with NZDF Output Plan specifications.

Overview

Both frigates achieved or bettered their planned sea day targets and planned preparedness targets were met. The ships’ personnel states were constantly managed to ensure there was an optimum mix of rank, trade, skills and experience, although this created pressures elsewhere in the Navy.

Equipment performance was sufficient for low-threat environments, and effective interoperability with friendly forces was achieved during the reporting period with participation in numerous exercises and the deployment of HMNZS Te Mana to the Persian Gulf and South-East Asia.

Projects to upgrade the frigates’ platform systems and close–in protection weapon systems are underway. A project has been identified to upgrade the frigates’ self–defence systems, subject to the outcome of Defence Review 2009.

Highlights

During the reporting period, the Naval Combat Force (NCF) participated in the following activities:

  • Coalition maritime operations in the Persian Gulf.
  • Bilateral Exercise Malzea with Malaysia.
  • FPDA exercises Bersama Lima and Bersama Shield.
  • Western Pacific Naval Symposium activity in Singapore.
  • Exercises and training with elements of the ADF.
  • Multi-agency operations and tasking and conducted Exercise Maru (PSI), Exercise Endurance (support to Department of Conservation in sub Antarctica Islands) and conducted New Zealand port visits.
  • Carried out Defence diplomacy activities in China, Malaysia, Singapore, India, Bahrain and United Arab Emirates.

Contribution to Outcomes

This Output Expense contributes to Intermediate Outcomes 1 and 2 (Secure New Zealand and Reduced Risks to New Zealand from regional and global insecurity).

Performance

Performance measurement for this output expense is in accordance with the standard measures for operational force outputs shown at the beginning of this section and those measures listed in the table below.

Performance Standards and Measures Performance Achieved

Standards

Two frigates, each with embarked Seasprite helicopter, as required, available for military tasks.  One frigate to be available for regional or collective security tasks and the second frigate to be available to deal with low-level security challenges in New Zealand or South Pacific waters.  The Offshore Patrol Vessels (OPVs) will assume the latter role once accepted into service.

Measures

NZDF OPRES (Operational Preparedness and Reporting System).  (See the OPRES Key Performance Indicators and OPRES Performance Rating Scale earlier in this section).

 

Apart from a period of planned maintenance for HMNZS Te Mana and the first phase to upgrade platform systems for HMNZS Te Kaha, two frigates, each with an embarked Seasprite helicopter, were available as required, for regional or collective security tasks and low level security challenges in New Zealand or South Pacific waters.

 

The OPVs were not available during the reporting period as they had not been delivered.

Standards

Mission Availability and Planned Sea Days for the year (1 July 2008-30 June 2009).

Measures

  • HMNZS Te Kaha will be mission available for 175 days, of which 90 to 110 days will be at sea.

 

 

  • HMNZS Te Mana will be mission available for 200 days, of which 130 to 140 days will be at sea.

 

 

 

HMNZS Te Kaha was mission available for 216 days and spent 142 days at sea. Planned days were exceeded due to resupplying the sub-Antarctic Islands in early 2009. This task was originally planned for HMNZS Canterbury. HMNZS Te Kaha also participated in a fleet concentration period off the east coast of Australia.

HMNZS Te Mana was mission available for 213 days and spent 138 days at sea, including a deployment to South-East Asia.

Standards

Contribute to a range of services in support of other government departments, the community, and foreign and defence policy objectives when not committed to operations, using the capabilities developed for the operational role.  [For details see the section on Services in Support of the Government and the Community, including MAO&T].

Measures

Satisfaction of the supported department/agency. Many of the MAO&T agreements/MOUs, which will include performance requirements (conditions and standards), are still under development.

 

During the reporting period, the NCF contributed to a range of services in support of other government departments, the community and foreign and defence policy objectives including multi-agency operations and tasking, Exercise Maru (PSI) and Exercise Endurance (support to Department of Conservation in the sub Antarctic Islands), participation in FPDA and bi lateral exercises, and diplomacy visits.

Services were carried out to the satisfaction of agencies3.

[See also the section on Services in Support of the Government and the Community, including MAO&T].

Standards

Standards and performance rating required under the NZDF Operational Preparedness and Reporting System (OPRES) against the four Elements of Preparedness (see the OPRES Key Performance Indicators and OPRES Performance Rating Scale earlier in this section).

Measures

While the aim, under the OPRES rating system, is an OPRES Rating of P1, for 2008/09 the following will apply:

  • For tasks under ECs 1 and 2 - a P1 OPRES rating.
  • For tasks under ECs 3 to 5 - a P2 OPRES rating.

 

 

 

 

 

 

For ECs 1 and 2, a P1 rating was achieved.
For ECs 3-5, a P2 rating was achieved.
(See paragraphs below)

Readiness:

Standards

  • Frigates that meet the Directed Level of Capability (DLOC) readiness criteria in accordance with Schedule 4 to the NZDF Output Plan.

 

 

Throughout the reporting period, with the exception of the planned platform system upgrade for HMNZS Te Kaha, the ships were available to support all military tasks requested that were within their current capability and manning constraints, and were capable of meeting DLOC readiness criteria.

  • Frigates carry out a range of training activities in accordance with the NZDF Exercise Activity Schedule (EAS) and the NZBR 99 (RNZN Instructions for the Generation, Maintenance and Evaluation of Operational Capability) to achieve DLOC.

Measures


NZDF OPRES, and relevant RNZN Publications, including:

  • NZBR 99 (RNZN Instructions for the Generation, Maintenance and Evaluation of Operational Capability).
  • Warrant of Armament Stores.
  • RNZN Master Personnel Establishments.

The NCF achieved DLOC by participating in exercises and being in company with other ships. HMNZS Te Mana was evaluated by the Navy’s Maritime Operational Evaluation Team (MOET) through an OLOC work up in 2009 and was assessed at OLOC for the deployment to the Persian Gulf. HMNZS Te Kaha was evaluated by the MOET by way of safety and readiness checks and continued to remain at DLOC.

Combat Viability:

Standards

  • Personnel that meet the collective training standards, experience levels, individual experience and competency requirements for military tasks.

 

Personnel met the collective training standards, experience levels, individual experience and competency requirements for military tasks. The ships’ personnel states were constantly managed to ensure there was an optimum mix of rank, trade, skills and experience to enable the ships to achieve their allocated tasks.

  • Equipment performance, reliability and technology that meet required standards for commitment to military tasks.

 

 

 

Equipment performance, reliability and technology met the required standards for commitment to military tasks in low threat environments.

The Platform System Upgrade and Self Defence Upgrade projects are critical to ensure the required standards are able to be met for future military tasks. (The Self-Defence Upgrade project is subject to the outcome of Defence Review 2009).

The SH-2G Seasprite has consistently delivered its range of capabilities during embarked operations and provided an effective asset to the frigates’ capabilities. (See Output Expense 11.)

  • Effective interoperability when working with friendly forces.

Measures

NZDF OPRES and RNZN Publications (as listed above).

Effective interoperability with friendly forces was achieved during the reporting period with participation in numerous exercises, including Bersama Lima, Aswex, a fleet concentration period in Australia, and the deployment of HMNZS Te Mana to the Persian Gulf.

Deployability:

Standards

  • Vessels capable of generating the Operational Level of Capability (OLOC) within designated Response Times (timeliness), as specified in Schedule 4 to the NZDF Output Plan.

 

Apart from periods of planned maintenance, both frigates were maintained at the required DLOC and were capable of generating OLOC for any assigned mission within the requirements of Schedule 4 to the NZDF Output Plan.

  • Stores and provisions embarked to allow tasking.

 

Stores and provisions were available to allow tasking.

(This standard is measured by the logistical supply system using time and quantity targets.)

  • Materiel state satisfactory to permit tasking.

 

Materiel state was satisfactory to permit tasking.

(This standard is measured by the logistical supply system using time and quantity targets.)

  • Personnel state satisfactory to permit tasking.

Measures

NZDF OPRES and RNZN Publications (as listed above).

The personnel state was satisfactory to permit tasking, but this did result in pressures elsewhere in the Navy (both at sea and onshore).

Sustainability:

Standards

  • Munitions available, as specified in the Warrant of Armament Stores, to maintain OLOC for the designated operational viability period (OVP).

 

 

Munitions were available to maintain OLOC for the designated OVP.

  • Fuel, stores and provisions available to maintain OLOC for the designated OVP.

Fuel, stores and provisions were available to maintain OLOC for the designated OVP.

  • Personnel available for sustainment/rotation.

 

 

Measures

NZDF OPRES and RNZN Publications (as listed above).

Personnel were available, but this did result in challenges elsewhere in the Navy. Retention and recruitment rates continue to present significant challenges. Sustainment and rotation requirements are not able to be evenly met across the Fleet – or across the Navy. Personnel are being posted to meet the highest priorities.

Costs for Output Expense 2 (GST Exclusive)

Actual
2007/08
($ million)
Category Main
Estimates
($ million)
Supplementary
Estimates
($ million)
Actual
2008/09
($ million)
  Expenditure      
90.040 Personnel 100.233 101.218 101.089
91.458 Operating 95.339 72.496 78.421
0.282 Losses on Foreign Exchange - - 6.050
96.828 Depreciation 104.784 115.744 113.023
107.324 Capital Charge 97.700 108.205 108.206
385.932 Total Expenses 398.056 397.663 406.789
  Income      
382.666 Revenue Crown 395.736 394.184 394.184
0.557 Revenue Department 0.792 1.552 1.227
1.551 Revenue Other 1.528 1.927 1.503
3.638 Gains on Foreign Exchange - 7.109 7.859
388.412 Total Income 398.056 404.772 404.773
2.480 Net Surplus (Deficit) - 7.109 (2.016)

The NZDF is appropriated for expenditure excluding remeasurements. Remeasurements are defined under the Public Finance Act as a revision of a future obligation that changes the carrying amount of an asset or liability. The total approved appropriation in 2008/09 for this output expense was $402.798 million and the total expenditure excluding remeasurements was $400.739 million. There was no unappropriated expenditure for this output expense.

3The NZDF has a number of MOUs with government agencies such as New Zealand Police, National Maritime Coordination Centre (NMCC), Maritime New Zealand (Oil Pollution) and Antarctica New Zealand. The NZDF agreed levels of commitment to MAO&T are contained in the NZDF Annual Output Plan and are reported in the NZDF Annual Report. With respect to measures of performance, NZDF operational preparedness reporting provides a measure of NZDF effectiveness to MAO&T support. In addition, the NZDF receives regular feedback on the satisfaction of the supported agency and through the NMCC as the agency charged with coordinating MAO&T. As at the end of the reporting period, more specific performance requirements were still under development.

Please use this pdf file to print this page.

This page was last reviewed on 1 October 2009, and is current.